Social Software Alliance

We propose a trade group of social software developers and other interested parties who work together to create and promote open standards for the social software community.

Email list archive

Happening for Apr18'2013 (3pm EDT)

The SocialText gang seems to be at the center of this...

Why might I be interested in getting involved? InterOp

  • forum for pushing some Wiki Standards to strengthen the WikiWeb

  • work with other wiki folks to make wiki more popular (both as personal writing tools and as Collaboration Ware)

  • tracking what non-wiki formats/APIs should be added to wiki to participate in the BlogWeb .

"Attended" the happening. Made my intro page

== What should the Social Software Alliance do, and why? ==

Core question: what risks to InterOp exist if they do nothing?

  • Microsoft/AOL will enter the marketplace with both WebLog authoring tools and an RssAggregator, and do weird things that other tools on both ends don't support (Embrace And Extend).

  • standards get promoted which are patent-bound.

  • good new specifications don't get picked up in the marketplace (quickly enough)

How might a BigCo game whatever system is in place?

  • Astro Turf: skew perceived weight of opinions through volume of messages by employees and PR flacks who fail to disclose their association

  • Follow a standard but in a meaningless way - MsWord XML.

What are some approaches that would be fast and low-overhead but maybe offer some benefit?

  • collect opinions on standards and compliance with them.

    • run a Topic Exchange server - a page for each standard, then sub-page for each vendor based on their support of the standard?

Edited:    |       |    Search Twitter for discussion